Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2)

Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana 3, Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana, 71450 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Property Transactions

6 subsales found

Median
RM605,000
PSF
RM159
Price Size
Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
RM605,000
Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana
3,800 sqft RM159 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Posts about Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2)

What’s happening in Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2)?

No posts about Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2) yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2)
© OpenStreetMap · CARTO

Jalan Bukit Senawang Perdana 3, Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana, 71450 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Maps

Taman Bukit Senawang Perdana (Phase 2) in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan recorded 6 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, sized between 3,775 and 3,824 sqft, with a median price of RM605K and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM159.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat.

Most transactions involved 1 - 1 1/2 storey semi-detached, with minimal variety in property types.

For price per square foot, the median is RM159, with most transactions between RM159 and RM159. The usual range is RM155.22 to RM163.22, showing that most units are priced quite close to each other. A typical spread (IQR) of RM8.00 and an average deviation (MAD) of RM0 indicate a highly stable PSF trend across properties.

Overall, the market in this area appears stable with consistent appreciation, making it an attractive option for both investors and homebuyers. The consistent property type and stable pricing make it easier to assess value and compare trends. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.