Taman Bukit Kepayang

Taman Bukit Kepayang, 70200 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Property Transactions

1 subsales found

Median
RM1,465,000
PSF
RM295
Price Size
Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM1,465,000
Jalan Mpk 3
4,973 sqft RM295 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Selling in Taman Bukit Kepayang? Homes here sold for a median of RM1,465,000.

Free to list, about two minutes, and the buyers reading this page will see it.

List your property free

Posts about Taman Bukit Kepayang

What’s happening in Taman Bukit Kepayang?

No posts about Taman Bukit Kepayang yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Market Snapshot

RM450,000

RM243 psf

Median transaction price

RM1,465,000

RM295 psf

Median transaction price

Taman Bukit Kepayang
© OpenStreetMap · CARTO

Taman Bukit Kepayang, Taman Bukit Kepayang, 70200 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Maps

Taman Bukit Kepayang in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan recorded 1 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, sized between 4,925 and 4,974 sqft, with a median price of RM1.47 million and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM295.

This area contains both residential and commercial properties. View 88 residential properties or 44 commercial properties separately for more focused analysis.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat.

Most transactions involved 2 - 2 1/2 storey terraced, with high diversity across multiple property types.

For price per square foot, the median is RM295, with most transactions between RM295 and RM295. The usual range is RM167.09 to RM422.09, showing that most units are priced quite close to each other. With an IQR of RM255.00 and MAD of RM0, the PSF demonstrates reasonable consistency across the market.

While the area has shown positive growth trends, price variations suggest a more dynamic market. This presents opportunities for investors comfortable with moderate volatility. Some price volatility exists, making thorough market research essential before transacting. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.