Taman Rapat Setia Baru

Ulu Kinta, Kinta, Perak, Malaysia

Property Transactions

5 subsales found

Price Size
Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM230,000
Prsn Wira Jaya Barat 76
1,496 sqft RM154 PSF
RM180,000
Persiaran Wira Jaya Barat 60
1,496 sqft RM120 PSF
RM230,000
Persiaran Wira Jaya Barat 76
1,496 sqft RM154 PSF
RM200,000
Persiaran Wira Jaya Barat 60
1,496 sqft RM134 PSF
RM200,000
Pers.wira Jaya Barat 76
1,496 sqft RM134 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Posts about Taman Rapat Setia Baru

What’s happening in Taman Rapat Setia Baru?

No posts about Taman Rapat Setia Baru yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Market Snapshot

Residential

RM200,000

RM134 psf

Median transaction price

Loading map...

TAMAN RAPAT SETIA BARU, Ulu Kinta, Kinta, Perak, Malaysia

Taman Rapat Setia Baru in Kinta, Perak recorded 5 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, sized between 1,475 and 1,524 sqft, with a median price of RM200K and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM134.

This area consists exclusively of residential properties, with no commercial listings recorded.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat. The median price is RM200K, with most transactions falling within a stable range of RM181K to RM219K, and a typical market range of RM180K to RM230K.

Most transactions involved 2 - 2 1/2 storey semi-detached, with high diversity across multiple property types.

For price per square foot, the median is RM134, with most transactions between RM121 and RM147. The usual range is RM116.67 to RM150.67, showing that most units are priced quite close to each other. A typical spread (IQR) of RM34.00 and an average deviation (MAD) of RM13 indicate a highly stable PSF trend across properties.

While the area has shown positive growth trends, price variations suggest a more dynamic market. This presents opportunities for investors comfortable with moderate volatility. Significant price variations suggest comparing multiple properties and timing the market carefully. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.