Taman Rapat Perdana

Ulu Kinta, Kinta, Perak, Malaysia

Property Transactions

11 subsales grouped by road

Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM328,000
2,465 sqft
RM133 PSF · 2-Sty Shop
RM360,000
1,475 sqft
RM244 PSF · 2-Sty Terrace
RM282,000
2,465 sqft
RM114 PSF · 2-Sty Shop
RM320,000
1,475 sqft
RM217 PSF
RM350,000
1,475 sqft
RM237 PSF
RM450,000
1,475 sqft
RM305 PSF
RM170,000
1,076 sqft
RM158 PSF · LC House
RM300,000
1,496 sqft
RM201 PSF · 2-Sty Terrace
RM285,000
1,496 sqft
RM190 PSF
RM280,000
1,475 sqft
RM190 PSF
RM420,000
1,475 sqft
RM285 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Posts about Taman Rapat Perdana

What’s happening in Taman Rapat Perdana?

No posts about Taman Rapat Perdana yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Loading map...

TAMAN RAPAT PERDANA, Ulu Kinta, Kinta, Perak, Malaysia

Taman Rapat Perdana in Kinta, Perak recorded 11 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, with a median price of RM320K and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM201.

This area contains both residential and commercial properties. View 9 residential properties or 2 commercial properties separately for more focused analysis.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat. The median price is RM320K, with most transactions falling within a stable range of RM282K to RM358K, and a typical market range of RM284K to RM356K.

Most transactions involved 2 - 2 1/2 storey terraced, with moderate diversity in property types available.

The median PSF stands at RM201, with core pricing between RM172 and RM230. Market pricing typically extends from RM172.01 to RM229.01, reflecting moderate variation in unit pricing. With an IQR of RM57.00 and MAD of RM29, the PSF demonstrates reasonable consistency across the market.

Overall, the market in this area appears stable with consistent appreciation, making it an attractive option for both investors and homebuyers. Despite diverse property types, prices remain relatively stable, offering options for different buyer preferences. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.