Taman Klebang Impian

Perak, Kinta, Ulu Kinta

Property Transactions

2 subsales found

Price Size
Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM460,000
Klebang Impian 7
2,799 sqft RM164 PSF
RM425,000
Klebang Impian 5
2,799 sqft RM152 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Selling in Taman Klebang Impian? Homes here sold for a median of RM442,500.

Free to list, about two minutes, and the buyers reading this page will see it.

List your property free

Posts about Taman Klebang Impian

What’s happening in Taman Klebang Impian?

No posts about Taman Klebang Impian yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Market Snapshot

Residential

RM442,500

RM158 psf

Median transaction price

Taman Klebang Impian
© OpenStreetMap · CARTO

Taman Klebang Impian, Kinta, Perak

Taman Klebang Impian in Kinta, Perak recorded 2 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, sized between 2,775 and 2,824 sqft, with a median price of RM443K and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM158.

This area contains both residential and commercial properties. View 4 residential properties or 2 commercial properties separately for more focused analysis.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat. The median price is RM443K, with most transactions falling within a stable range of RM425K to RM460K, and a typical market range of RM425K to RM460K.

Most transactions involved cluster house, with high diversity across multiple property types.

For price per square foot, the median is RM158, with most transactions between RM152 and RM164. The usual range is RM132.61 to RM183.61, showing that most units are priced quite close to each other. With an IQR of RM51.00 and MAD of RM6, the PSF demonstrates reasonable consistency across the market.

While the area has shown positive growth trends, price variations suggest a more dynamic market. This presents opportunities for investors comfortable with moderate volatility. Some price volatility exists, making thorough market research essential before transacting. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.