Taman Kobena

55300 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Property Transactions

4 subsales grouped by size

Price Size
Period
transactions middle 50% (P25–P75)
RM250,000
Level G
969 sqft · RM258 PSF
RM193,000
Level 4
969 sqft · RM199 PSF
RM630,000
Jalan 2/92B
936 sqft · RM673 PSF
1,200 sqft
2-Sty Terrace
RM600,000
Jalan 2/92B
1,206 sqft · RM498 PSF
Legend Recent Highest Price Highest PSF

Posts about Taman Kobena

What’s happening in Taman Kobena?

No posts about Taman Kobena yet. Be the first to share what’s happening here.

Market Snapshot

Residential

RM425,000

RM378 psf

Median transaction price

Taman Kobena
© OpenStreetMap · CARTO

Taman Kobena, 55300 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Maps

Taman Kobena in Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur recorded 4 subsale transactions between 2021 and 2026, with a median price of RM425K and a median price per square foot (PSF) of RM378.

This area contains both residential and commercial properties. View 14 residential properties or 2 commercial properties separately for more focused analysis.

Price remained flat, and PSF growth was PSF remained flat. The median price is RM425K, with most transactions falling within a stable range of RM227K to RM623K, and a typical market range of RM250K to RM600K.

Most transactions involved 2 - 2 1/2 storey terraced, with moderate diversity in property types available.

Price per square foot shows a median of RM378, though individual units vary from RM188 to RM568 in the core range. The broader market spans RM241.76 to RM514.01, indicating diverse property characteristics. A wider spread (IQR: RM272.25) and deviation (MAD: RM190) indicate significant PSF variations, likely due to diverse property types or conditions.

While the area has shown positive growth trends, price variations suggest a more dynamic market. This presents opportunities for investors comfortable with moderate volatility. Significant price variations suggest comparing multiple properties and timing the market carefully. Limited transaction history suggests carefully evaluating comparable sales data.